What must the EFDP ensure when reviewing nominations?

The expectation for the Enlisted Force Development Panel (EFDP) when reviewing nominations is to ensure that the consideration process is conducted without prejudice or partiality. This principle upholds the integrity and fairness of the nomination process, allowing each candidate to be evaluated based solely on their merits, accomplishments, and potential, rather than being influenced by external factors such as personal relationships, biases, or other discriminatory practices.

By maintaining this impartial approach, the EFDP can effectively promote a culture of equality and inclusivity, which is vital for fostering a healthy and supportive environment within the military. This commitment to fairness also reassures nominees that they are being evaluated on a level playing field, thereby enhancing morale and trust in the selection process.

In contrast, while scoring nominations and publicizing them may be important to maintain transparency and accountability, they do not address the essential aspect of ensuring an unbiased evaluation. Moreover, the notion that only top-performing Airmen would be considered could lead to an exclusionary environment that fails to recognize the potential and contributions of all candidates, regardless of their current standing.